primary example of the conflicts of interest between his role as a researcher and his role as an NFL adviser.Last week, in response to the UW inquiry and at the request of the NFL,

SWANSEA, Wales -- Sergio Aguero scored twice on his return from suspension as Manchester City beat Swansea 3-1 to clinch a sixth straight win to open the English Premier League on Saturday.Raheem Sterling grabbed the other goal for City, whose only negative was the sight of playmaker Kevin De Bruyne limping off late on with an apparent hamstring injury.City has won its first 10 games of the season under new coach Pep Guardiola -- a club record -- and has a four-point lead after six rounds in the Premier League. Guardiola tied Carlo Ancelottis Chelsea record for six consecutive victories at the start of a league.Maybe it was our best performance with the ball, Guardiola said.Aguero, back in the team following a three-match domestic ban for elbowing an opponent, has netted 11 goals in six games this season, and he opened the scoring in the ninth minute, leaving marker Jordi Amat floundering with a brilliant first touch from Bacary Sagnas pass, and finishing clinically.Swansea equalized four minutes later when Gylfi Sigurdsson found Fernando Llorente, who sent a rasping half-volley high into Citys net.In an end-to-end match, both team created chances at will but City needed a contentious refereeing decision to retake the lead in the 65th.Michael van der Hoorn was adjudged to have challenged De Bruyne unfairly, and Aguero wrong-footed the goalkeeper with a cheeky penalty.Swansea piled forward in search of another equalizer and left itself open at the back. When Leon Britton lost possession, Sterling powered upfield and applied a neat finish in the 77th.Speculation is intensifying about Francesco Guidolins future as Swansea manager, with the team picking up four points from a possible 18.I have a good relationship with my players and they were fantastic this afternoon, Guidolin said. If the board have anything to say to me, it is easy -- they can just call me. If we continue to play this way we have a good future in front of us.Nike air vapormax plus skroutz . James, who turned 29 on Monday, injured his groin Friday during the Heats overtime loss at Sacramento. He sat out the following game, a 108-107 win Saturday in Portland, before coming back to help send the Nuggets to their seventh consecutive loss. nike air vapormax προσφορες . Oyama had six birdies and two bogeys at Kintetsu Kashikojima in the event also sanctioned by the Japan LPGA Tour. "I have been having this neck ache thats been affecting my golf recently," Oyama said. http://www.vapormaxgreece.com/nike-vapormax-plus-greece.html .J. -- Josh Cribbs was in the Pro Bowl in February and out of a job six months later. nike vapormax προς πώληση . Perhaps Carroll was so prepared for a break because he believes there is very little the Seattle Seahawks need heading into the off-season. "I dont see anything that we need to add. We just have to get better," Carroll said. nike vapormax φθηνα . PAUL, Minn.The NFLs removal this week of the doctor who oversaw the leagues now-discredited concussion policies comes as another top NFL health adviser is under scrutiny for allegations he tried to influence a major government study on football and brain disease.The University of Washington has formed a special committee to investigate Dr. Richard Ellenbogen, co-chairman of the NFLs Head, Neck and Spine Committee and chairman of UWs Department of Neurological Surgery, a university spokeswoman told Outside the Lines.A May congressional report identified Ellenbogen as one of the NFLs primary advocates in an unsuccessful campaign to strip a $16 million grant from a Boston University researcher who has criticized the league. The NFL tried to redirect the money to league-affiliated doctors, including Ellenbogen, according to the report.Ellenbogen and Dr. Elliot Pellman, the leagues longtime, controversial medical adviser, were among at least six top NFL health officials who pressured the National Institutes of Health, the report said. On Wednesday, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell told the leagues team owners that he will replace Pellman with a new full-time chief medical officer.The University of Washington investigation of Ellenbogen was launched at the request of Dr. Paul Ramsey, the dean of the school of medicine, spokeswoman Tina Mankowski told Outside the Lines. Ellenbogen will have the opportunity to participate, she wrote in an email.We are currently reviewing the allegations that were made in the congressional report concerning Dr. Ellenbogen and his role as an unpaid member of the NFLs Head, Neck and Spine Committee, Mankowski wrote.Ellenbogen did not respond to requests for comment. He previously denied being part of any effort by the NFL to influence the seven-year study, which aims to find methods for detecting -- in living patients -- chronic traumatic encephalopathy, or CTE, a brain disease that has been found in dozens of deceased NFL players.Asked if Ellenbogen still has the support of the NFL commissioner, Brian McCarthy, a league spokesman, wrote in an email to Outside the Lines: Dr. Ellenbogen has our full support, and no changes are being considered for the leadership of the Head, Neck and Spine Committee. A man of esteemed merit, Dr. Ellenbogen has selflessly dedicated his life to science and service. He is a physician on the frontlines of this issue, every day working to advance the understanding, prevention and treatment of head injuries.McCarthy said the NFL is aware of the UW inquiry but has no comment because it is ongoing.UW declined to provide further details about its investigation, which was first reported by USA Today. Researchers familiar with similar academic inquiries told Outside the Lines the university likely has a range of options if its determined that Ellenbogen acted inappropriately, from a written reprimand to asking Ellenbogen to withdraw from the NFL committee.Tom Murray, president emeritus at the Hastings Center, a non-profit bioethics research institution, criticized Ellenbogen for attempting to influence the NIH in his role as an NFL adviser.This is a very big deal, very significant, something [Dr. Ellenbogen] should not have done, said Murray, who specializes in the ethics of sports-related research.Murray, who has worked with the NIH as an applicant and a reviewer, said it was unclear to him whether Ellenbogens actions violated university regulations. But within the scientific community, is his reputation going to suffer? Very likely, Murray said.Details of the NFLs attempt to influence the NIH -- first reported by Outside the Lines in December -- have stunned many scientists. Emails revealed by VICE Sports this month showed that in 2012 Ellenbogen hoped to provoke the firing of a top NIH official. The official had rebuffed Ellenbogens request to include more NFL doctors at an NIH-led workshop on CTE, the emails showed.One prominent researcher told Outside the Lines that he now fears the NFL -- one of the largest funders of brain research in the United States -- is willing to use its money and influence to attack anyone who opposes the league.I cant imagine writing an email to a colleague trying to get another person in government fired; its more or less unreal, said the researcher, who requested anonymity because of concerns about possible backlash from the NFL. Is this the University of Washingtons position -- that its OK to do that, using the schools email, acting on [the NFLs] behalf?Everybody is talking about this. Its one of the most amazing things Ive ever seen in my career.A NIH official familiar with the situation, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, called Ellenbogens behavior several standard deviations from the norm.Some NIH scientists remain livid about what they perceive as the NFLs attempts to meddle in the agencys scientific-review process, which is widely regarded as sacrosaanct, and wonder whether the relationship is beyond repair, two sources told Outside the Lines.ddddddddddddfter backing out of a commitment to fully fund the CTE study, the NFL announced that it intended to use the money for other NIH research. In 2012, the NFL gave an unrestricted $30 million gift to the NIH for brain research.The NIH has scheduled a workshop for mid-October to focus on the impact of concussions on youth. League-affiliated researchers are expected to participate, according to an NIH spokesperson.Asked about the prospect of a future study using the NFLs money, the NIH official who requested anonymity said: We would have to think through whether or not the specifics of the agreement are acceptable, and, certainly in consideration of that, everybody will be mindful of what has come before.The stakes for the University of Washington in the controversy are high. One of the leading research institutions in the country, UW received $434 million in research funding from the NIH in 2015, according to university figures, and has received $4.36 billion over the past decade.Ellenbogen has received $109,867 from the NIH for a neuroscience training program over the past two years, according to an NIH database. Since he became co-chairman of the Head, Neck and Spine Committee, the NFL and affiliated entities have handed out at least $6.5 million for projects connected to Ellenbogen and UW. The projects include $2.5 million for a new concussion clinic anchored at UW and $2.4 million from Seattle Seahawks owner Paul Allen for a two-year traumatic brain injury study.Ellenbogen has said repeatedly that he serves the NFL as an unpaid volunteer. The league told congressional investigators that Head, Neck and Spine Committee members are reimbursed for expenses and also receive Super Bowl tickets.The stakes also are high for the NFL. The league and its corporate partners have committed more than $100 million for scores of research studies over the past four years, Outside the Lines reported in February, giving the league enormous influence over a public health issue that directly affects its bottom line.After Pellmans Mild Traumatic Brain Injury committee was disbanded amid a torrent of public criticism in 2010, the NFL brought in respected specialists like Ellenbogen, University of North Carolina concussion researcher Kevin Guskiewicz and University of California San Francisco neurosurgeon Mitch Berger to lead its health and safety program. Berger said at the time that he and his colleagues were starting essentially from zero.But Pellman, despite a reduced role, remained heavily involved and ultimately served as a liaison between the league and the NIH. In an email that surfaced in the report by Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, Pellman wrote, There are many of us who have significant concerns re BU and their ability to be unbiased and collaborative. ... Im hoping that you could communicate our concerns and slow down the process until we all have a chance to speak to figure this out.The congressional report described two separate phone calls in which Ellenbogen tried to sway NIH leadership to change the decision. Ellenbogens actions, the report said, raised significant questions about [his] own bias. The congressional report stated: Dr. Ellenbogen is a primary example of the conflicts of interest between his role as a researcher and his role as an NFL adviser.Last week, in response to the UW inquiry and at the request of the NFL, Dr. Robert Cantu, a Boston University Neurosurgeon who serves as a senior adviser to the leagues Head, Neck and Spine committee, sent a letter to the dean at UW defending Ellenbogens integrity, USA Today reported. Cantu is on both sides of the issue, because hes also listed as a researcher on the BU project that was at the heart of the NIH debate.The VICE story, published last month, revealed how, in 2012, Ellenbogen became incensed after Dr. Walter Koroshetz, then deputy director of the National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke, refused his attempts to include two other NFL-connected doctors -- in addition to one who had been invited -- in a workshop set up by the NIH.In a lengthy email, Ellenbogen wrote Koroshetz: Politics has gotten in the way of the science.He then wrote two other members of the Head, Neck and Spine Committee: Walter needs to be fired.Rather than being fired, Koroshetz -- a former Harvard neurology professor regarded as one of the most respected and beloved administrators in the NIH -- was promoted to director of the institute. In that role, he rejected the NFLs efforts to have the BU award rescinded.Hes become even more beloved since he stood up to the NFL, said one researcher who deals frequently with the NIH. He became a kind of mythical figure thanks to that. ' ' '